Posted by 
The researche adds to the existing evidence that adults, children and students of all ages learn better when seeing an object before hearing its description. The study builds on past research by focusing on learning in “inconsistent” environments featuring different teaching styles or distracting noises.”Understanding how the learning process occurs, and what factors affect it, may help instructors improve methodologies of education,” said Timmy Ma, a research associate at Dartmouth.
Learning environments can often complicate the learning process. For example, a student taking a course with both a teacher and a teaching assistant needs to adapt to the ways the different instructors teach the same subject. Even the varying ways teachers talk and behave can complicate learning. For the study, researchers intentionally provided confusing information to mimic these types of inconsistencies to subjects that were tasked to learn the names of three fictional characters — “yosh,” “wug” and “niz” — using two types of learning methods.
The first method, “object-label learning,” is when a student sees an object first and then is provided with the label. This means seeing a color before being told its name. Or hearing a description of a physical force before being hearing its formal title. The second learning procedure is “label-object learning,” the reverse order in which a student sees a label first.
Subjects in the study were asked to match the pictures of the characters with their made-up names. The presentation of information was intentionally misleading to see if learners have an easier time dealing with the inconsistency depending on the way the input was presented — either object first or label first. The results of the study indicate that students who see objects first and then hear the name — object-label learners — process inconsistent information better than learners who hear the name first and then see the object.
Researchers detected that learners that interact with the object before hearing the name perform “frequency boosting” — the ability to process noisy, inconsistent information to identify and use the most frequent rule. For example, when teachers interchangeably use “soda” or “pop” to describe the name of a carbonated beverage, the children who use frequency boosting will learn to use the term that is used most frequently.A key feature of frequency boosting is that learners will also use the rule more consistently than the instructor.